On Jan 28, 2005, at 01:38, Eric Scheid wrote:
On 28/1/05 7:39 AM, "Henri Sivonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the value of "type" is "XHTML", the content of the Text construct MUST be a single xhtml:div element
-1 gratuitous element cruft. The text construct element itself serves as a container.
but atom:title != xhtml:title
also, are there such things as xhtml:copyright, xhtml:info, or xhtml:summary?
No, but that is not the point. The *Atom* Text constructs work as containers. The div is just cruft.
IMO,
<a:copyright type='XHTML'>Copyright 2005 John Doe, <h:em>all rights reserved</h:em></a:copyright>
(assuming 'a' to be bound to the Atom namespace and 'h' to the XHTML namespace) is less crufty than
<a:copyright type='XHTML'><div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>Copyright 2005 John Doe, <em>all rights reserved</em></div></a:copyright>
.
Even if you wanted to declare the XHTML namespace on the spot, you could put the declaration on the Atom Text construct. Any feed reader using namespace-aware XML tools properly will have no trouble dealing with the less crufty versions.
-- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://iki.fi/hsivonen/
