Saturday, January 29, 2005, 11:13:51 AM, you wrote:
>> The RDF vocabulary was just constructed ad-hoc - like I said, it is >> just a proof of concept. It uses a separate namespace to Atom and >> defines some new terms, which solves any problems with non-unique >> attributes. > That makes sense. Hopefully it should be possible to narrow down the > terms in a way that they can all coexist in the Atom namespace. Possibly, but I'm not sure how important it would be. Being able to globally identify an XML attribute, isn't all that useful. Being able to globally identify the property that the XML attribute implies is more useful - and that is what an RDF mapping would enable. The RDF mapping is going to need to reserve terms under a namespace for Classes and other concepts that don't directly appear in the Atom/XML syntax - so using a separate namespace doesn't seem like a bad idea. > One question - do you have a permanent URI for this? I've just made a page: http://djpowell.net/atomrdf/0.1/ I fixed a couple of bugs since I last posted. I've also made an RDFS for it. Dan Brickley pointed out that you can test the XSLT using the W3C's XSLT service, rather than having to download an XSLT processor. http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xslt -- Dave
