On 22/12/04 11:44 AM, "Bob Wyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Scheid wrote:
>> Looking at the list of elements one would find in a <head> leaves
>> me wondering what other elements you might want.
>
> Title, Link, Author, tagline, and others... As well as any
> "extension" stuff that might be there.
Feed specific stuff is useful for identifying and filling out the feed, but
they don't (shouldn't) have much bearing on the entries themselves.
> For instance, at somepoint, we're going to get some way to associate an image
> with a feed as is done with RSS.
But that image is associated with the *feed*, not the *entry*.
Consider the entry which is simultaneously published in multiple feeds --
does that somehow change the nature of the *entry* itself, other than the
context of circumstance?
And if an entry could exist in multiple feeds, is it possible an entry could
exist without being in any feed? Finding such entry might be a tad
difficult, or maybe not ... it might be a side-entry linked from a regular
feed-entry, and thus discoverable.
<link type="application/atom+xml" rel="note" href="..." />
Are you suggesting that before an entry can be authored, a feed must first
be established into which it would then be placed?
e.
