John Panzer wrote:
I realize it's late for new Paces.
It is not late for protocol Paces.
[1] In fact my original PaceSimpleResourcePosting had verbiage discussing WebDAV compatibility, which was stripped out during the editing process as "irrelevant" when it was incorporated into the draft. I understood at the time that it was irrelevant because WebDAV compatibility was assumed; was I wrong?
IIRC, the WebDAV text was stripped as part of the chairs' read on consensus, so the editors did not include it. I don't the answer to your last question.
Robert Sayre
