Norman Walsh wrote: > |> Should they also be allowed *between* atom:entry elements in a feed? > | > | As the spec uses "interleave" content models, I think they are/will... > > In the -06 draft, a feed is an interleave of metadata elements followed > by a sequence of 0 or more atom:entry elements.
Hmm, right, sorry... > | though I wonder why interlaced content models are used instead of | > "ordered" content models... that would also allow DTD or XML Schema | > (or any other schema requiring deterministic content models) to be | > used to validate Atom documents... > > Because the spec says they aren't ordered. Well, by "ordered", I actually meant "non-interleaved", e.g. having a deterministic content model... -- Thomas Broyer
