Norman Walsh wrote:
/ Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | Norman Walsh wrote: | |> The point is that extensions should allow atom:content inside the |> extension, is that right? | | Yes. Any atom element should be allowed in an extension.
Fix appended.
Thank you.
And I happened to notice that our example feed in 1.1 is invalid. It does not contain an atom:link element with a relation of "alternate".
It's valid, because link elements without the rel attribute have a relation of "alternate".[0]
Robert Sayre
[0] <http://atompub.org/2005/04/04/draft-ietf-atompub-format-07.html#rfc.section.4.2.9.2>
