On 4/26/05, Roger B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd be willing give a +1 to SHOULD language regarding summary/content.
That's not good enough. You have to demonstrate an interop problem to say SHOULD or MUST. > I'd prefer one or the other be required for a weblog-centric format > like Atom, but I'll just do what I already do with title-only RSS > feeds... have my code reject them as inadequate. Just like it would reject an entry containing <summary/>, since it means the same thing, right? You yourself send them: http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg14147.html They are clearly adequate for some class of applications, so please demonstrate the interoperability problems they cause. Robert Sayre
