On 4/26/05, Roger B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And so on... I honestly can't think of a single child of atom:entry > that is required for interop.
Yeah, I agree. The WG does not, however. They do happen to agree with me on this issue. > No one needs Atom for producing a title-and-link feed. It's overkill, > and pointless. The juice in Atom is in the handling of content... > providing for explicit summaries, and clearly defined payload types. The juice in Atom has little to do with the syndication format. IDs and dates are big, though. Robert Sayre
