* Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-05 02:35+1000] > > On 4/5/05 11:11 PM, "Robert Sayre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The autodiscovery spec is a reasonable interpretation of the *one > > line* definition of the 'alternate' relation. > > how is a feed of recent entries a "substitute version for the document in > which the link occurs" when that document is some blog post long since > dropped out of the feed?
Because the HTML definition is close to meaningless. I can substitute any document for another, and the 2nd is a substitution not through any intrinsic characteristics, but because it was substituted. Many of the HTML link type definitions don't bear up under detailed scrutiny... Dan
