On 5/6/05, Martin Duerst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 11:50 05/05/06, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > >Tim Bray wrote: > >> +1 > >> There are people who want to publish feeds without rel="alternate" > links. I'm against telling people they can't do something they want to do > without strong reasons, as in loss of interoperability. I don't see the > reasons here as strong enough. -Tim
+1 as well. In this case, the problems faced by producers seem to outweigh those faced by consumers. The link doesn't seem to be helpful as an identifier, so that's orthogonal. Robert Sayre
