Friday, May 6, 2005, 3:52:19 PM, Eric Scheid wrote:
> On 7/5/05 12:09 AM, "Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "If an Atom Feed Document contains multiple entries with the same >> atom:id, software MUST treat them as multiple versions of the same >> entry" >> >> I don't think this changes the technical meaning of the proposal, but >> does make it very explicit. > +1, with one minor amendment. > s/versions/instantiations/ > the spec uses that word elsewhere, and 'versions' might suggest a media > adaptation, language variant, etc. How about "revisions"? "versions" could sound too broad, it could imply that the entry could change for all sorts of reasons, conneg etc. "instantiations/instances" could sound like they could be identical copies of the same information. "revisions" suggests something that changes over time, which is closer to what we mean I think? -- Dave
