On 5/19/05, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <co-chair-mode> > Paul and I consider that the following text has consensus support of > the WG and the editors are directed to include it in the format draft > (editorial judgment call on where to insert): > > Some applications (one example is full-text indexers) require a minimum > amount of text or (X)HTML to function reliably and predictably. For > that reason, it is advisable that each atom:entry element contain a > non-empty atom:title element, a non-empty atom:summary element when the > entry contains no atom:content element, and a non-empty atom:content > element when that element is present. > </co-chair-mode>
Is this text intended to replace the paragraph the editors were previously directed to insert? Robert Sayre
