On 5/21/05, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > <http://atompub.org/2005/04/18/draft-ietf-atompub-format-08.html#rfc.section.4.2.7.1> > > > > I was wondering about: > > > > # Likewise, > > # > > # http://www.example.com/~bob > > # http://www.example.com/%7ebob > > # http://www.example.com/%7Ebob > > # > > # are three distinct identifiers, because IRI %-escaping is significant > > # for the purposes of comparison. > > > > s/significant/insignificant/? > > I see I might have misinterpreted the prose. If so, I think it is not > very clear. Can't we just say something that atom:id IRIs MUST NOT be > normalized?
I think the last paragraph of RFC3987, section 5.1 already says that :) http://rfc.net/rfc3987.html#s5.1. Robert Sayre
