On 22 May 2005, at 01:27, Robert Sayre wrote:
On 5/21/05, Bob Wyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Sayre wrote:
So, it's about disambiguating versions of an entry, right?
No. It has nothing to do with "versions" or even
"variants." I have
explained that on numerous occasions. The denial of relevance to
the issue
of "version" is even in the title of this thread. Read:
"atom:modified
indicates temporal ORDER not version..." Clearly, you either
aren't reading
what you're responding to or you simply don't understand what is
written
Temporal order of what? They are all the same entry, so what is it you
are temporally ordering?
You are temporally ordering states of the entry.
Or if you think of the id as the resource for which the <entry>...</
entry>
text is a representation, then you are ordering the representations
sequentially/temporally.
Why is this a new problem that only arises
when we allow multiple IDs in the same feed?
I don't think this is a problem that only arises when we allow
multiple ids in the
same feed.
Henry
Robert Sayre
