On May 22, 2005, at 3:13 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
>> We suggest that there may be WG consensus in favor of changing the
>> format spec to make atom:id a required child of atom:feed.
(Text not
>> provided, we trust the editors to figure out the correct way to say
>> this). Please indicate agreement or disagreement with this
proposition
>> in the next day or two.
>
>wth, +1
+1 here too. Regards, Martin.
<co-chair-mode>Having reviewed the commentary over the last three
days, I observe a couple of +1's, a few "not my favorite approach but
OK", and no objections. I see rough consensus in favor of making
atom:id a compulsory child of atom:feed.</co-chair-mode>
-Tim
