Hiya, I'm trying to understand the intention of the draft, together with some of the comments posted here recently. I've only been looking at Atom for a couple of days so I may be misunderstanding.
As I understand it, the intention is that atom:author within atom:feed applies to all child atom:entry elements; that is, the value is inherited. This being the case I have a dilemma with a feed I would like to aggregate from others. If I collect the atom:entry elements from those feeds and include them in another feed that I produce, there is no place for my name to appear within the new feed. That is, I am not the author of the entries so I cannot appear as the atom:author of any atom:entry. And if the intention is that the atom:author within atom:feed be inherited then I cannot place my name there. The only other element that seems appropriate is the atom:generator element, however it is implied that this is the tool used to generate it ('the agent used'), rather than the person whose responsibility the feed is. In this case I am not looking for any particular 'advertisement' of name, but a means whereby a reader can examine the feed and know who is responsible (to blame) for it. Is there a suitable place for identifying the feed's author without affecting the entries themselves ? Is the atom:feed/atom:author a suitable place for this ? -- Gerph <http://gerph.org/> ... And I'm lonely here inside of me.