At 6:01 PM +0900 6/24/05, Martin Duerst wrote:
>
>Some care (and some headstart) is nonetheless helpful.
>Ted at
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_comment&id=36539
>says " This is true for any scheme which does not support IRIs natively."
>This is slightly inaccurate; schemes are irrelevant here, it's protocols
>that count (which is the word used in most of the rest of the text).
Martin's right; I should have said "protocols" instead of "scheme" in
the text above. I have adjusted the discuss text in the tracker to
fix that.
Ted
