On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 15:03 +0200, Thomas Broyer wrote: > Dave Pawson wrote: > > Any one site could now have n instances, each being a feed, the only > > variant (apart from entries) being the links to previous feeds. > > If I'm to say *this* is my feed, I guess I point to the most recent... > > which will change over time? > > > > With the example of 15 entries per, > > > > feed1 1..15 > > feed4 45..60 > > > > my 'feed' for my site rolls over from feed1...n as time progresses? > > I guess the answer is: > http://example.com/latest is your feed, e.g. containing the latest 10 entries > http://example.com/archive-1 through n are your "archive" feeds.
Which would mean that the instance at /latest keeps changing? I need to keep swapping old ones out, new ones in, i.e. rebuilding each time? I guess that's another reason it feels like a kludge. > > You can see "latest" as an Atom alternate for your home page (or latest > news page) and "archive-1" through "archive-n" as Atom alternates for your > "archive" pages. I can see the logic of your suggestion. Doesn't seem clean though? <snip/> Other issues. regards DaveP
