On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 16:13 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Paul, two points.
> 
> For me to be happy, your specification must mandate that xmldsig be
> used whenever encryption is used.
> 
> As a consequence of this and your decision not to support MACs, then
> in order to encrypt a document, you must sign it.  In addition, in
> order to accept this encrypted document, the recipient must be able to
> verify your signature.
> 
> Please confirm with the working group that these requirements are
> acceptable.  In particular this forbids the case where I submit an
> entry encrypted to some third party who I don't share a PKI with.

An aweful lot of 'must's there Sam, for one persons view?
I see no reason to using signing, just because I choose to encrypt?

Sounds a bit too corner case for my liking.

DaveP

Reply via email to