Robert Sayre wrote: > I worry that any statement like Bill's suggested text will confer > legitimacy on Atom 0.3 as long as the RFC is available. *Every* > current implementor is aware of the issue, so the short term benefit > of such text is pretty much nil. Long term, the text will actually be > harmful.
+1 to this sentiment - I take it this means we're saying no to the interop text in the spec?
