* Paul Hoffman wrote: >This is rarely done in RFCs. Further, Section 5 is clearly listed in >the table of contents, and someone who intends to implement the >protocol probably has at least skimmed the document before they read >the details in the Security Considerations section.
Well, I think the lack of detail in 8.5 is confusing and adding a "(see section 5)" in auth48 would improve the legibility of the document; such cross-references are not uncommon in long RFCs either, but I do not feel strongly about this. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
