Is the mixed format case really possible? Last time I looked there
were problems,
such as different tags using attributes with the same name but with
different
semantics. I thought we were close last time I looked, but not quite
there.
Henry
On 15 Jul 2005, at 22:21, Dan Brickley wrote:
Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
* Dan Brickley wrote:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/samples/atom/a1.xml
`Content-Type: text/xml; qs=0.9`. Hurray...
I could fix that... question is, to what? :)
The Atom spec says Atom docs are identified using the Atom media
type, but
I don't see anything like a 'SHOULD NOT' regarding serving them
with other types.
In the mixed-format case of an instance being both valid RDF, and
valid Atom, we
get into pragmatics. RDF tools wouldn't know it was RDF/XML since
Atom doesn't
allow a toplevel rdf:RDF wrapper element as foreign markup. But
Atom tools also
have a claim on the content type. Maybe it could be content-
negotiable? Something
for everybody...?
Dan
