* Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-30 05:20]: > On 30/6/05 11:54 AM, "Antone Roundy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't quite get what the "hub feed" would look like. Could > > you show us some XML? > > I think something like this: > > <feed> > ... > <title>archives hub for x</title> > <link href="http://example.com/archive/feed/2005/05/"; > type="application/atom+xml" > rel="prev" /> > <link href="http://example.com/archive/feed/2005/04/"; > type="application/atom+xml" > rel="prev" /> > <link href="http://example.com/archive/feed/2005/03/"; > type="application/atom+xml" > rel="prev" /> > <link href="http://example.com/archive/feed/2005/02/"; > type="application/atom+xml" > rel="prev" /> > <!-- no entries --> > </feed>
Exactly. > ... although ... now that I've typed that out ... the semantics > of "prev" are borked. Indeed. > So maybe something more like this would make better sense > > <feed> > ... > <entry> > <id .../> > <link href="http://example.com/archive/feed/2005/05/"; > type="application/atom+xml"/> > <title>Archive for 2005/05</title> > <summary>27 posts</summary> > </entry> > </feed> I like! > also, how can RFC3229+feed provide subsets where one end isn't > tied to the most recent entry? It can’t. Is there a need for that beyond a minor overhead of redundancy? Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
