* James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-22 01:25]: >For instance, if I linked to anything but an Atom feed, what >would in-reply-to link to?
Still atom:id values. Presumably, any resource linked to is associated, by whatever means, to the Atom feed containing the entry being replied to. I don’t know what behaviour would be most sensible for cases where it’s not an Atom feed and I’m not advocating trying to specify any. I just think it’s a good idea to say that the specified expectation, ie that it’s the Atom feed where the entry being replied to originated, applies only when @type='application/atom+xml'. That way, if someone else figures out a sensible thing to do for other cases in the future, they can extend the same relation rather than needing to specify a new one. >If the entry level link specifies a different URI, then it's >basically an assertion that the entry is a response to two >different entries. Ah, the feed-level link simply inherits. Good idea, I like that. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
