On 31/7/05 7:47 AM, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I¹m -1 on using ³replies-source²; I should have said so more > explicitly before. To me it is non-sensical, as it parses as ³the > source of replies,² which is the opposite relationship of what > it¹s supposed to express. It¹s not where the replies come from, > it¹s where the entries being replied to come from. replies-referent then? (ie. the target of a reference) e.