Sounds good.
On 7/31/05, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Sayre wrote:
> > The documents linked below represent the editors' efforts to resolve
> > our single IESG objection, and to fix a few spec bugs that have been
> > brought up in the past few weeks. If anyone objects to any of the *new
> > text*, please speak up.
> >
> > diffs:
> > http://franklinmint.fm/2005/07/31/draft-ietf-atompub-format-11-from-10.diff.html
> >
> > txt:
> > http://franklinmint.fm/2005/07/31/draft-ietf-atompub-format-11.txt
> >
> > html:
> > http://franklinmint.fm/2005/07/31/draft-ietf-atompub-format-11.html
> >
> > Robert Sayre
> >
>
> This is truly a nit:
>
> If neither the type attribute nor the source attribute is provided,
> Atom Processors MUST behave as though it were present with a value
> of "text".
>
> What is "it"? The type attribute? The source attribute?
>
> Suggestion:
>
> s/ it / the type attribute /
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
