Sascha Carlin wrote: > Graham said: > >>the format. I will figuratively lie down in the road if anyone >>suggests whitespace should be allowed around any machine-read content >>(uris, @type, @rel, etc). > > > +1. Possible whitespace would add general check & removal calls to any > processor. When you process 100 items, thats not a problem. Staring with > 10.000 is begins tu hurt, and will blow it up when you reach 100.000 items.
Interesting. 1. What should I do when I see this: <id> urn:foo </id> 2. What should I do when I see this: <id> urn:foo </id> 100,000 times? Again to make it clear: I am not arguing for whitespace in atom:id. I am arguing that whitespace is inevitable in atom:id and I think in that regard the spec is buggy, one way or another. cheers Bill
