Dave Pawson wrote:
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 09:31 -0700, Tim Bray wrote:
I'm getting increasingly grumpy and "just fail" is looking better and
better.
So for now, I'm -1 on an weakening or removing "The element's content
MUST be an IRI" or analogous text in any other section. I'll stop
shouting if I'm in a small minority here.
It's clean, except I'd like an informative statement for people
failing and wondering why.
And something in the schema that lets people know why, since we
can validate against the schema and *pass*?
Now that could be confusing.
regards DaveP
+1 on both (not changing the semantics, but possibly adding a warning
that whitespace *really* is significant here).
regards, Julian
