Eric Scheid wrote:
On 2/10/05 3:54 PM, "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I've been going through the effort of defining a number of Atom
extensions, I've consistently come back to the thought that it would be
interesting to explore the creation of a "Common Extensions Namespace"
under which multiple standardized extensions can be grouped. I've
written an initial draft of the concept but before I submit it as an
Internet Draft, I'd like to get some feedback from the group. Please
review the attached and let me know what you think.
Do you want to start it off as an empty container, or might it be strategic
to submit it with a number of extensions mentioned by reference. If the
latter, it would serve a bootstrapping purpose for developers new to Atom.
A bit like that page for RSS which enumerates a collection of extensions.
Been thinking about this. I think it is better to submit extensions by
reference. I have a handful of extensions that I'd already like to move
this direction.
----
What about mustIgnore/mustUnderstand? An extension sharing the ACE ns can't
require mU, right?
that would be my interpretation.
- James
