Ah, missed that, you're right. There is no way of indicating whether or
not a feed is a full-content feed vs. a summary feed beyond the presence
(or lack thereof) of the atom:content element.
James Holderness wrote:
My understanding was that if fh:incremental was false the feed
document should be considered a complete replacement for any previous
document you may have received. This would be for things like top 10
lists.
I believe the question being asked here is actually about the entries
themselves not being complete.
James M Snell wrote:
Using Mark Nottingham's Feed History extension, you could do
<fh:incremental>false</fh:incremental>
Byrne Reese wrote:
Does anyone know of an extension or mechanism that can indicate
whether a given feed is a complete representation of the content it
encompasses, or is just a summary?
