On 25/10/05 3:43 AM, "James Holderness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My only suggestion would be using rel="enclosure" on the inner links rather > than "alternate". There will be some Atom processors [1] that won't be able > to tell the difference between an inner link and an outer link. and we're back to the duplicate bandwidth problem again :-( > If you combine this with the requirement that an inner link with the same > type and hreflang as the outer link must be bit-for-bit identical, we could > cover the other use-case of multiple download sources. So far, no new > elements or attributes necessary. what about the use case of alternate formats (etc) for the same resource? > Not sure about the legality. not legal, since atom:link cannot appear there ie. while atom:link (the container) can contain foreign markup, atom:link (the embedded) is not foreign markup. e.
