On 13/4/06 8:02 AM, "David Powell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In terms of the considerations to the interoperability of running > code, thr:replies seems to beat atom:link in every way. It even > manages to be more concise (you don't need the @rel), and you wouldn't > need to put thr:count and thr:when into a namespace (namespaced > attributes confuse people). atom:link beats thr:replies on the basis that I don't need to understand what "replies" are to discover that there is a link from this thing to that thing. atom processors know what atom:link is, but it wouldn't know what to do with this: <xyz:qwerty foo="opaque-string" bar="opaque-string qaz="opaque-string" zak="opaque-string" /> e.