Hi Robert,
While I'm not entirely thrilled with James, and I believe you provide
some useful perspective,
if you think it is appropriate and ethical to respond by posting
private email to the list, I must reluctantly conclude that this list
is better off without you.
Sincerely,
Ernest Prabhakar
On May 30, 2006, at 7:25 PM, Robert Sayre wrote:
Hmm, do you harass everyone who disagrees with you like this? I am
kind of taken aback by this unprofessional conduct. I don't see how I
am supposed to participate in an IETF working group if the document
authors are going to engage in this kind of vitriol. I wonder if you
think it's ok to write this kind of thing in private email. I'm
disappointed. :/
On 5/30/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[OFF-LIST] [OFF-LIST] [OFF-LIST] [OFF-LIST] [OFF-LIST] [OFF-LIST]
Had I meant to cc the list, it stands to reason that I would have
cc'd
the list.
I've grown quite tired of this
Insult-James-And-Everything-He-Does-And-Says campaign of yours.
You are
accomplishing nothing. Get a life and move on.
- James
[OFF-LIST] [OFF-LIST] [OFF-LIST] [OFF-LIST] [OFF-LIST] [OFF-LIST]
Robert Sayre wrote:
>
> I think James forgot to cc the list
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: May 30, 2006 9:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Link rel test cases
> To: Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
>
> Robert Sayre wrote:
>> [snip]...have James add it to his revision of 4287. :)
>>
>>
>
> Pardon, what the hell are you talking about? Do you really,
honestly
> believe that being a complete ass is a productive use of
anyone's time?
>
> - James
>
>
--
Robert Sayre
"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
