Quite a few folks seemed to have a preference to a separate doc. - James
Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote: > On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:39:25 +0100, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Ideally, I would much rather this be a WG draft. I pinged Tim about it >> the other day and he suggested that I go ahead with a I-D for now and >> that we can explore whether or not to move forward with it as a WG draft >> later. > > Can't just the APP specification include language that specifies a new > MIME type for Atom Entries, since it's mostly APP implementations that > have a use for it? Or would that be totally out of place? > > --Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/ > «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away» >
