Eric Scheid wrote: > On 15/12/06 7:29 AM, "Sylvain Hellegouarch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Besides, if you want to do fancy thing with a member, simply post a >> media resource which is an atom entry. This won't be modified by the >> server and will solely be treated a media resource. > > promise? does the spec support this assertion? or is this another case of > "the server is in charge and can accept or change whatever it wants"? > > e.
No you are right, this is a gratuitous assertion here. However APP currently describes what a server is allowed to do on a member resource and not on the media resource. It could be interesting to see how extensions to APP could allow the server and the UA to agree on what level of modification each party is entitled to expect. - Sylvain
