+1.
Antone Roundy wrote:
> [snip]
> So you couldn't keep both as "alternate" links. In my opinion, you
> should use the second one (the longer lasting one) only, and omit the
> first (which is going to become invalid as soon as the entry falls off
> the page anyway -- anyone who used it to get to your page and bookmarked
> it, and anyone who follows it from a cached copy of your feed isn't
> going to be able to find the entry without a lot of needless digging
> through your archives). You should have a link to
> http://www.cafeconleche.org/ at the feed level. While that won't link
> directly to that entry, it'll get people to it as long as it's on that
> page.
>
>
