On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:33:38AM -0800, Jason Brooks wrote: > >> Note that if we stay on 1 or 2 now, we will have to change at a later point > >> in the future in case we want to introduce FAH and FAW logos (unless > > FWIW the current Fedora Atomic Host logo we're using (at least on the > > download page) is > > https://getfedora.org/static/images/atomic-head-logo.png > It seems appropriate to vote on the Project Atomic logo on this ML, > but the Fedora Atomic things should go through Fedora processes. Maybe > one of the monday atomic community meetings would be the best place to > discuss this, vs one of the wed meetings, which are about feodra.
Yeah, I just want to make sure they tie together. > It's always been a bit confusing, but Project Atomic proper was > explicitly chartered *not* to distribute an OS, for reasons I don't > think I ever fully understood. But it's always been the Fedora and I think it was, pretty much: we already have three operating systems in the family, and splitting things further was (and is) the wrong direction. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader
