On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 08:59 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Axel Thimm <axel.th...@atrpms.net> wrote: > > --> Missing Dependency: libltdl.so.7()(64bit) is needed by > package > > mpg123-1.13.0-13.el5.x86_64 (atrpms)
> Hm, this is tricky. This is part of a newer libtool, and > usually the > autotools suite does not leave any external runtime > dependencies. In > this case mpg123 explicitly uses libtool libs. > > There are two ways out: Try to rebuild with RHEL5's libtool or > ship the > newer libtool in ATrpms (with the usual move to testing etc. > issues). > mpg123 has a BR libtool-ltdl-devel, > but how did it get a newer libtool in rhel5? > Maybe you have (or had) a newer libtool there "floating around" during > the build? All ATrpms packages for RHEL use newer autotools as many package will not build on older autotools. The backward compatibility was excellent until now with autotools, but it was so because autotools were mostly build time only. With linking libtool's ltdl and an sobump this changed now. -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
