On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Axel Thimm <axel.th...@atrpms.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 08:21 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
> > I see what is happening. F12 and F13 also use kernel 2.6.32.
> > However, their kernels have not been patched by RedHat.
> >
> > Therefore, the adriver patch should not be applied to F12 and
> > F13.
> > The simplest way is adding a bcond something. Nonetheless, F12
> > is dead
> > and F13 is going to die soon. Should we just let them rest in
> > peace??
>
> It also affects all RHEL5 kernels but the very latest. RHEL is a slow
> upgrading platform for most users, so the support of at least a few
> kernels is a must.
>
But rhel5 still uses the kernel 2.6.18.
The change was just lowering from kernel 2.6.35/2.6.37 to 2.6.32. It should
affect only
F12 (2.6.32), F13 (2.6.34) and previous rhel6 versions only. I do not see
how
rhel5 was affected ....
The adriver patch is listed below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff -Naur alsa-driver-1.0.24/include/adriver.h
alsa-driver-1.0.24-new/include/adriver.h
--- alsa-driver-1.0.24/include/adriver.h 2011-01-27 10:09:20.000000000
-0200
+++ alsa-driver-1.0.24-new/include/adriver.h 2011-05-20
18:41:26.108621169 -0300
@@ -1909,7 +1909,7 @@
#endif
/* hex_to_bin() */
-#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 35)
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 32)
static inline int hex_to_bin(char c)
{
if (c >= '0' && c <= '9')
@@ -1923,7 +1923,7 @@
#endif
/* vzalloc() wrapper */
-#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 37)
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 32)
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
static inline void *vzalloc(unsigned long size)
{
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
_______________________________________________
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
