Hi, On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 03:56:37PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: > Hi Axel, > > Looked at avidemux (avidemux-2.5.6-30.src.rpm) and it compiled fine > on both f18 and f19 :-) didn't do a thing.
It should had failed - the specfile requires BuildRequires: /bin/arch which now lives under /usr/bin. Maybe the symlinks of existing packages save the day, but in a clean chroot it doesn't pull in the right packages. A solution would be to not use file provides, but packages provides. I used file provides because the package name changed from util-linux to coreutils, but perhaps all supported distros for avidemux are just on coreutils by now. > It is a bit old, so perhaps I will try to upgrade to version 2.6.4 > later in the weekend. That sounds great, I'll hold off from rebuilding the older one in case you do upload a fresher version, thanks!! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net _______________________________________________ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
