Matthias Hensler wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 10:09:11PM +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
Yes, otherwise the support would be incomplete. I'm not yet sure how
to add this, as some of the packages that are replaced will make the
mob angry and shout "ATrpms replaces fedora core packages!" ;)
Well, currently no Fedora package is replaced: the mkinitrd scripts are
installed seperately. However there might be a better solution (having
this in upstream would be great, maybe it will happen sooner or later,
since mkinitrd from rawhide already includes support for swsusp1).
Maybe swsusp2 and friends should get into their own repository class,
which is not any more on the linear stable-testing-bleeding category.
We'll see. First we need to make sure swsusp2 really works on most
boxes.
The current packages should be pretty stable, at least for i586, i686
and i686-smp. However, for x86_64 a lot of testing is required (the
architectures is still early development).
As I was the one asking for this in the first place I'll make sure to
test this! :-)
Thanks.
I do think we should try to convince Matthias to rename the hibernate
rpm though because it conflicts with the hibernate package from the
JPackage repository :-)
Hmmm, the hibernate RPM is currently not maintained by me, but by
Bernhard Blackham (I just recompile it and make sure it works on
Fedora).
That issue was already discussed before:
http://lists.suspend2.net/lurker/message/20050816.012636.9c836cf9.da.html
Maybe I should build an own RPM and rename it to hibernate-script?
I think that's the best because (although I do think that pepending all
java packages with java- would have been a good idea) I don't think they
will change the name of the hibernate package anytime soon seeing the
amount of usage those java packages already have.
Cheers,
-Tako
_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
