On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 07:34:08PM +0200, Marcel Janssen wrote: > Hi Axel, > > I managed to get opengroupware to work on FC5-386 but I'm still using the > RPMS > from opengroupware.org from their FC4 repository. > > What I did is described in the following two mails : > http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/users/2006-March/015993.html > http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/users/2006-March/016009.html > > It comes down to making mod_ngobjweb work again so that apache starts (needs > a > very small patch) and symlink some newer libraries found on FC5 to older > version numbers that are needed by opengroupware. > > I tested it a little and so far everything seems to work well.
Thanks for the infos. I still haven't found any time to proceed with development of the packages. Mainly because the system I wanted to run it on fried its MB, but there were also some issues with FC5's (and FC4's) objc, that are now fixed in rawhide. > There's a question I have regarding your intentions for > opengroupware on ATrpms. Opengroupware also has their own > repositories, so I'm not sure which is best to follow if you also > put opengroupware in your repositories. Wouldn't it make more sense > to just have this all at the opengroupware repositories ? (I suppose > they also will have a FC5 repository soon) The FC4 bits didn't work for me and when I checked the packages they were partly built with FC3 rpms (it isn't possible to use FC4's objc). I think there were also no x86_64 packages available. I decided to try to get it done properly. If the ogo rpms works for you, then stick with them. When I'll get on with packaging I would appreciate testing, but don't break your production system. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgp9ZKIlM6err.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
