Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 08:39:39AM -0600, Shad L. Lords wrote:
>>> [...] but before the update, mythtv wasn't a meta package, it
>>> included the /usr/share/doc part mythtv. And it was a required
>>> package for at least mythtv-frontend (I can only check this on the
>>> frontend now, since the backend has already been updated). So for
>>> the old mythtv packages mythtv was not a meta package, but was a
>>> required package for mythtv-frontend, [...]
>
>> So if you you had either the frontend or backend build 158 installed then
>> when you upgrade you will get the 161 build of mythtv that has all the extra
>> dependencies.
>
> Argh! hat actually counts as a packaging error. I should had named the
> (new) mythtv package something else. :/
Axel,
Is there a fix coming for this?
--
Kevin J. Cummings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org)
_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
