On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:48:53AM -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 08:39:39AM -0600, Shad L. Lords wrote: > >>> [...] but before the update, mythtv wasn't a meta package, it > >>> included the /usr/share/doc part mythtv. And it was a required > >>> package for at least mythtv-frontend (I can only check this on the > >>> frontend now, since the backend has already been updated). So for > >>> the old mythtv packages mythtv was not a meta package, but was a > >>> required package for mythtv-frontend, [...] > > > >> So if you you had either the frontend or backend build 158 installed then > >> when you upgrade you will get the 161 build of mythtv that has all the > >> extra > >> dependencies. > > > > Argh! hat actually counts as a packaging error. I should had named the > > (new) mythtv package something else. :/ > > Axel, > Is there a fix coming for this?
Not really, since the fix would break the people that now did upgrade to this package (which BTW were structured like this for over two months in bleeding and testing, but obviously no one tested them with a partial install and an upgrade), but there is an easy workaround (other than installing all and starting to remove the parts you don't want): rpm -e --nodeps libmyth smart upgrade --update -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpeD4YqgmRV6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
