On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 03:23:05PM -0800, Scott Simpson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Axel Thimm <axel.th...@atrpms.net> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 09:34:24PM -0800, Scott Simpson wrote: > >> Some how my fedora core 10 box got upgraded to mythtv*0.22* rather > >> than mythtv*0.21* which is on stable. I don't know why. > > > > What does rpm -q mythtv say? > > It says > > myt...@mythtv:~$ rpm -q mythtv > mythtv-0.22-0.5.rc1.fc10.i386
That's not from ATrpms, so the upgrade that happened was not triggered by ATrpms-stable. Also it's an old version by now, there was an rc2 and now a golden release. Upgrade first, then check for bugs and then report to the packager (e.g. if you use ATrpms report here, otherwise to the source of your packages, probably rpmfusion). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpBfxgTZRLUd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
