David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
>> That said, I don't have a strong opinion on that. If you prefer the
>> on-demand loading version, I'm happy to change it accordingly.
>
> Triggering a load of tex.el happens rather easily (loading any TeX
> file, even if you are just browsing, will achieve that). For that
> reason, it makes sense to make most of its interactive dependencies
> autoloading rather than loading them directly. Similar for latex.el,
> and font-latex.el (I think even tex-buf.el manages to stay unloaded
> unless you are actually working with the buffer commands). I don't
> remember how crm-separator is actually being used, so I'm not sure
> about the best path here. It just rang my alarm bell.
You are probably right, however just a forward-declaration of
`crm-separator' in tex.el doesn't work. That is, when you eval
(progn
(defvar crm-separator)
(let ((crm-separator ","))
(require 'crm)))
afterwards, `crm-separator' is void as a variable instead of having the
init value defined in crm.el. That's exactly the original problem.
Bye,
Tassilo
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
