Hi Arash, 2016-06-24 12:48 GMT+02:00 Arash Esbati <esb...@gmx.de>: > Hi all, > > there is an item on AUCTeX's wish list: > > o Spell checking of macros > A special ispell dictionary for macros could be nice to have. > > I'm not sure if there were activities in this regard in the past, but > AFAICT, it is about adding items to car and/or cdr of > `ispell-tex-skip-alists'. Please consider an example attached below > (which does not compile): Run ispell (I tried hunspell, BTW) with > standard settings and then eval the code inside "lstlisting" and run it > again. > > I think it should suffice if AUCTeX provides one or two functions (much > more sophisticated than mine, of course ;-) to add items to > `ispell-tex-skip-alists'. I would also suggest to collect all items in > a file like `tex-ispell.el' -- my feeling is it is easier to maintain > than on a per-style basis. Only document macros should be considered, > preamble only macros are ignored anyway. Styles could use this function > for parsed elements. > > WDYT?
To be honest, I'm not much into ispell, but the proposed patch looks promising, at least for the results it provides. I just wonder how Flyspell (the mode I actually use ;-) can benefit from this, because it seems to still mark as errors words in macros arguments and "lstlisting" environment. Bye, Mosè _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel