Hi Mosè, Mosè Giordano <m...@gnu.org> writes:
> 2016-06-24 12:48 GMT+02:00 Arash Esbati <esb...@gmx.de>: >> Hi all, >> >> there is an item on AUCTeX's wish list: >> >> o Spell checking of macros >> A special ispell dictionary for macros could be nice to have. >> >> I'm not sure if there were activities in this regard in the past, but >> AFAICT, it is about adding items to car and/or cdr of >> `ispell-tex-skip-alists'. Please consider an example attached below >> (which does not compile): Run ispell (I tried hunspell, BTW) with >> standard settings and then eval the code inside "lstlisting" and run it >> again. >> >> I think it should suffice if AUCTeX provides one or two functions (much >> more sophisticated than mine, of course ;-) to add items to >> `ispell-tex-skip-alists'. I would also suggest to collect all items in >> a file like `tex-ispell.el' -- my feeling is it is easier to maintain >> than on a per-style basis. Only document macros should be considered, >> preamble only macros are ignored anyway. Styles could use this function >> for parsed elements. >> >> WDYT? > > To be honest, I'm not much into ispell, but the proposed patch looks > promising, at least for the results it provides. I just wonder how > Flyspell (the mode I actually use ;-) can benefit from this, because > it seems to still mark as errors words in macros arguments and > "lstlisting" environment. I don't use Flyspell, so hard for me to tell. Does Flyspell support skipping environments at all? The only relevant variable in flyspell.el I see is `flyspell-tex-command-regexp' which matches only TeX commands. Currently, I don't have an idea how to integrate Flyspell into this. Best, Arash _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
