Arash Esbati <ar...@gnu.org> writes:

> Jeremy Bryant <j...@jeremybryant.net> writes:
>
>> Philip, my suggestion was to continue on adapting AUCTeX for emacs.git
>>
>> Alternatively, I can volunteer to work on a prototype bundling of
>> AUCTeX, but would need your suggestions on this.
>
> The way I see it Emacs maintainers have signaled they support putting
> AUCTeX into core.
>
> I think the natural way to proceed is that AUCTeX maintainers agree on
> this step internally, decide what's the best way for the further
> development, and come back to Emacs in order to discuss that outcome and
> make a final decision together.
>
> I'm saying this because currently, I don't know myself if AUCTeX should
> follow the Org approach (Own Git repo, merge with Emacs on a regular
> basis) or close the own shop and move into Emacs wholesale.  Let's not
> forget the ELPA releases as well.  The bundling is only one step among
> many others, I think.  And I don't think we have to rush: This will not
> happen for Emacs 30.
>
> Best, Arash

Moving this thread from emacs-devel to this list.

Given this will be an extended move, what do the maintainers think about
the pro and cons of e.g. the 'org approach' with regular merges around
the time of Emacs releases?

Reply via email to