Weird. After - though not expecting anything to change - trying your suggestion a second time:
> How about > (let ((process-connection-type nil)) > (start-process "dummy" (current-buffer) TeX-shell TeX-shell-command-option > "cmd.exe")) > then? Does it open a windows command prompt? This time the following > popped up, not in the minibuffer, but in the same buffer "scratch", just > after the last ")" in your command: "\\wsl$\Debian\home\citizen13" CMD.EXE wurde mit dem oben angegebenen Pfad als aktuellem Verzeichnis gestartet. UNC-Pfade werden nicht unterstützt. Stattdessen wird das Windows-Verzeichnis als aktuelles Verzeichnis gesetzt. Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.19044.1889] (c) Microsoft Corporation. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. C:\Windows> Quick & dirty translation: CMD.EXE was started with the above stated path as present directory. UNC-paths are not supported. Instead the windows-directory is being set as present directory. Microsoft [...] etc. (c) [...] All rights reserved. C:\Windows Makes a non-technical person wonder: May this be considered a success or the contrary? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FreeMail powered by mail.de - MEHR SICHERHEIT, SERIOSITT UND KOMFORT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FreeMail powered by mail.de - MEHR SICHERHEIT, SERIOSITT UND KOMFORT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FreeMail powered by mail.de - MEHR SICHERHEIT, SERIOSITÄT UND KOMFORT
